11 Kasım 2026, Çarşamba
Dünya Magazin

Judge Refuses to Dismiss Trump’s $10 Billion Defamation Suit Against BBC

Judge Refuses to Dismiss Trump’s $10 Billion Defamation Suit Against BBC
Judge Refuses to Dismiss Trump’s $10 Billion Defamation Suit Against BBC
⭐ Kategori: Dünya Magazin
⏱️ Okuma Süresi: 3 dk
📝 Kelime: 687
🕐 Son Güncelleme: 11.11.2026 20:15

📌 Öne Çıkan Detaylar

  • Nov 11, 2026 9:15am PT Judge Refuses to Dismiss Trump’s $10 Billion Defamation Suit Against BBC By Gene Maddaus Plus Icon Gene Maddaus Senior Media Writer @GeneMaddaus Latest Trump on ‘60 Minutes’ Reflects on Midterm Loss, Death and Forgiveness: ‘I Do Hate Some of My Enemies’ 3 days ago Nithya Raman Wins L.A.
  • Mayor’s Race as Karen Bass Concedes 6 days ago Blue Wave Sweep: What Does Democratic Shift Mean for Hollywood and the Media?
  • 7 days ago See All Add us as a Google Preferred Source Comments A federal judge on Tuesday denied the BBC’s motion to throw out President Trump’s $10 billion defamation suit over a documentary about the Jan.

Judge Refuses to Dismiss Trump’s $10 Billion Defamation Suit Against BBC hakkında magazin dünyasında yaşanan en son ayrıntılar ve sıcak gelişmeler netleşti. Nov 11, 2026 9:15am PT Judge Refuses to Dismiss Trump’s $10 Billion Defamation Suit Against BBC By Gene Maddaus Plus Icon Gene Maddaus Senior Media Writer @GeneMaddaus Latest Trump on ‘60 Minutes’ Reflects on Midterm Loss, Death and Forgiveness: ‘I Do Hate Some of My Enemies’ 3 days ago Nithya Raman Wins L.A. Mayor’s Race as Karen Bass Concedes 6 days ago Blue Wave Sweep: What Does Democratic Shift Mean for Hollywood and the Media?

⭐ Olayın Perde Arkası ve Merak Edilenler

7 days ago See All Add us as a Google Preferred Source Comments A federal judge on Tuesday denied the BBC’s motion to throw out President Trump’s $10 billion defamation suit over a documentary about the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S.

İlginizi çekebilir: Ethan Klein Asks Judge to Deny Estranged Wife Hila’s Spousal Support Request

Hollywood ve dünya yıldızlarının hayatındaki son gelişmeler, küresel magazin basınının manşetlerini süslüyor.

Ayrıca göz atabilirsiniz: Rusya’dan Ermenistan kararı: İki önemli hakkı elinden alındı detayları için tıklayın.

💬 Sosyal Medyada Geniş Yankı Uyandırdı

Kuntz found that Trump could make an argument that the BBC should be held liable for splicing together two parts of Trump’s speech from that day to make it appear that he incited violence. Related Stories Park Hoon-jung’s Assassin Noir ‘Tristes Tropiques’ Sells to North America, France, Spain AFM: First Look at Highland Film Group Thriller ‘The Black Demon: Atlantis’ Starring Jack Kesy (EXCLUSIVE) “BBC tries to frame this editing as ordinary editing done to condense a seventy-minute-long speech into twelve seconds.

But the Court is not persuaded,” Kuntz ruled . “This was not trimming around the edges but creating something different than what was stated in the speech.” Trump celebrated the ruling as “a Huge Victory against Fake News BBC” in a post on Truth Social, and praised Kuntz, whom he appointed to the bench earlier this year, for his “powerful ruling.” As a Florida appellate judge, Kuntz authored an opinion allowing Trump to sue members of the Pulitzer board.

A spokesperson for the BBC said that the news organization was surprised by the ruling. “We are surprised by this decision but respect the Court’s authority and note the case will now proceed to the next stage,” the spokesperson said.

“We remain confident in our position and will continue to respond through the proper legal process.” Trump sued over a BBC “Panorama” documentary that aired shortly before the 2024 U.S. The program entitled “Trump: A Second Chance?” edited Trump’s speech to juxtapose the line “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be there with you,” with another remark that came nearly an hour later: “And we fight.

We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” The BBC apologized in November 2025, saying the edit had given “the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action.” Two top BBC executives resigned amid the fallout. The BBC has argued, however, that the editing does not rise to the level of defamation.

In its motion to dismiss, the broadcaster argued that Trump cannot show that he suffered actual damages. The BBC also argued that Trump cannot show “actual malice” — the high standard for defamation of public figures under the Supreme Court ruling in New York Times v.

In his ruling, Kuntz disparaged that precedent, while acknowledging that he is bound by it. “It cannot be said that Sullivan is grounded in the original meaning of the Constitution, at least not in any meaningful sense,” the judge wrote.

“Nor is Sullivan grounded in the history and tradition of the common law… It is logical then, that a public figure like the President of the United States should not be subjected to a heightened standard non-existent at the time of the Founding.” The case w

Gelişmelere ilişkin tüm sıcak açıklamalar, fotoğraf kareleri ve magazin dünyasından son dakika haberleri magazinsitesi.com üzerinden anlık olarak güncellenmektedir.

💬 Sıkça Sorulan Sorular

❓ Bu haberin temel konusu nedir?

Judge Refuses to Dismiss Trump’s $10 Billion Defamation Suit Against BBC konusunda meydana gelen son dakika magazin gelişmeleri aktarılmaktadır.

❓ Sıcak gelişmeler nereden takip edilir?

Magazin dünyasından tüm en yeni haberler magazinsitesi.com üzerinden canlı olarak aktarılmaktadır.

Haberi paylaş:
Magazin Sitesi Editör Masası

Magazin Sitesi Editör Masası

Magazin Sitesi editörü. Magazin, televizyon ve ünlü dünyasındaki gelişmeleri takip ediyor.

İlgili Haberler

Yorum yaz

E-posta adresiniz yayınlanmaz. Hakaret ve kişilik hakkı ihlali içeren yorumlar onaylanmaz.

Yapımcı: eritir.com.tr